- From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:28:31 -0400
- To: www-math@w3.org
> ... But, unlike Slidy, which would require the user to author
> well-formed XHTML+MathML, the input format for Instiki is much more
> user-friendly. While you *can* enter raw XHTML(+ MathML), it's much
> easier ...
What I suggested would require the user to *generate* correct
XHTML+MathML with suitable hooks for slidy, but I would never
recommend that an author undertake direct editing of raw xhtml+mathl.
I might have mentioned that there's a development-level
xhtml+mathml+slidy formatter for use with gellmu that may be found at
http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/gellmu/. (The diffs from the standard
xhtml+mathml formatter [11400 lines of perl] amount to only 55 lines.)
-- Bill
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 21:29:02 UTC