- From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:29:55 +0200
- To: Andreas Maier <MAIERA@de.ibm.com>
- Cc: W3C MathML Mailing List <www-math@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 09:30:33 UTC
Hi Andreas, 2009-10-12 08:41 Andreas Maier <MAIERA@de.ibm.com>: > What is not clear to me is how I would place a MathML fragment containing > the *definition* of such an operator into a common XML instance document, > separate from the MathML fragment *using* the operator in another XML > instance document (that would include the common XML instance document). > > Does the MathML fragment shown above represent the definition of the > operator, or its usage (in which case, the content of the <ci> element > would need to be changed to the actual feature names, e.g. f1 or f2) ? Your fragment _uses_ the operator, but does not define it. With MathML alone, there is no way of defining operators. MathML can _use_ so-called content dictionaries (see http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter4.html#contm.cds), which contain definitions of operators, but it cannot be used to write them. XML languages for writing content dictionaries are, e.g., OpenMath (http://www.openmath.org) or OMDoc (http://omdoc.org). Hope that helps, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 09:30:33 UTC