- From: Karl Tomlinson <w3@karlt.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:31:15 +1300
- To: Neil Soiffer <Neils@dessci.com>
- Cc: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>, www-math@w3.org
Neil Soiffer writes: > The current draft spec ... Is the editor's draft publicly available? > ... says: > > "Any number of values can be given for notation separated by whitespace; all > of those given and understood by a MathML renderer should be rendered. Each > should be rendered as if the others were not present; they should not nest > one inside of the other. For example, notation="circle box" should result in > circle and a box around the contents of menclose; the circle and box may > overlap. This is shown in the first example below." "Each should be rendered as if the others were not present" I think addresses my question, thank you. I think it clearly implies that the position and size of each notation relative to child elements depend only on the child elements (not on other notations). I assume that implementations are permitted to position and size the menclose (as a whole), thus positioning all the notations, relative to the menclose's sibling and ancestor elements, in a manner that depends on (the maximum extents of) the particular set of notations. But I don't think a reader would be likely to infer otherwise from the text above.
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2009 02:31:55 UTC