- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:22:45 GMT
- To: paul@activemath.org
- Cc: ch.lange@jacobs-university.de, www-math@w3.org, c.mueller@jacobs-university.de
> Would it make sense that the MathML default renderings, for some > symbols, really are multiple to remind the diversity to a reader which > may forget it? Lcm and interval are examples we can easily provide... we could do, and have in the past, eg http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html#id.4.4.9.1.3 has two renderings for mean. Although I seem to remember that has caused comment that giving multiple renderings is confusing unless we say which one to use. I think Christoph's suggestion of calling them sample renderings rather than default may be good, it's easier to have multiple sample renderings than multiple defaults.... David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 21:23:24 UTC