- From: JB Collins <joebmath@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:20:27 -0800 (PST)
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <244946.47340.qm@web57604.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
It seems to me that the following captures the intended meaning:
<apply>
<int/>
<domainofapplication>
<ci type=''vector''>r</ci>
</domainofapplication>
<apply>
<ci type=''function>&rho</ci>
<ci type=''vector''>r</ci>
</apply>
</apply>
</apply>
i.e., integrate the function, &rho, over its whole domain.
Do you agree?
R/jbc
--- On Tue, 11/4/08, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Volume integrals in Content MathML
To: joebmath@yahoo.com
Cc: www-math@w3.org
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 4:14 PM
> It would be useful to have a way to abstractly refer, in a basis free
> manner, to curves, surfaces, volumes, etc., over which integrals are
> to be evaluated.
I think
<apply>
<int/>
<domainofapplication>
specifcation of surface, volume etc
</domainofapplication>
lambda term representing the function to be integrated
</apply>
should do this.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 10:47:52 UTC