- From: JB Collins <joebmath@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:20:27 -0800 (PST)
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <244946.47340.qm@web57604.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
It seems to me that the following captures the intended meaning: <apply> <int/> <domainofapplication> <ci type=''vector''>r</ci> </domainofapplication> <apply> <ci type=''function>&rho</ci> <ci type=''vector''>r</ci> </apply> </apply> </apply> i.e., integrate the function, &rho, over its whole domain. Do you agree? R/jbc --- On Tue, 11/4/08, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> Subject: Re: Volume integrals in Content MathML To: joebmath@yahoo.com Cc: www-math@w3.org Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 4:14 PM > It would be useful to have a way to abstractly refer, in a basis free > manner, to curves, surfaces, volumes, etc., over which integrals are > to be evaluated. I think <apply> <int/> <domainofapplication> specifcation of surface, volume etc </domainofapplication> lambda term representing the function to be integrated </apply> should do this. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 10:47:52 UTC