- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:08:43 GMT
- To: hsivonen@iki.fi
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> Do any common MathML generators generate whitespace around enumerated > attribute values? I've no idea, but I'm vary wary of the (commonly expressed) argument that some feature is not used much so can be removed. Even for features that are bad, illogical or even possibly never implemented, I think that unless there is overwhelming reason to remove them they should be kept. Documents live forever, but applications (eventually) get upgraded to the latest version of the spec. Making a breaking change that makes old documents no longer work with new applications should be avoided at all costs. There's no hard and fast rules here different people take different value judgements on when it's worth breaking with the past to improve the future. Perhaps it's my TeX background, but I know I'm positioned much further towards the "never change anything" end of the scale than most people. (Any of my colleagues on the WG could confirm that they have heard the above argument from me at F2F meetings and phone conferences, on more than one issue within the spec:-). As always these are personal opinions, not in anyway to be taken as WG consensus. David
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 14:09:26 UTC