- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:59:30 +0100
- To: hsivonen@iki.fi
- CC: public-html@w3.org, www-math@w3.org
Henri, > Using the MathML entities in XML requires a doctype, because otherwise > the document would be ill-formed. Yes and no. The HTML5 spec could state that when processing application/xhtml+xml documents that the application should (effectively) use a catalog that supplies DTD entity definitions for the HTML5 entities (it may make sense to do this regardless of whether the "html5 entity set" ends up being the html4 names or html4+mathml names). <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <p>φ</p> </html> or even just <html> <p>φ</p> </html> is well formed (but not valid) if the parser is using a catalog that says (for example) that any document with document element "html" should use a dtd that (just) defines some set of html5 entities. David
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 11:01:06 UTC