- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:36:02 +0100
- To: chris@chiasson.name
- Cc: max@berger.name, www-math@w3.org
> What about using the actual character for the integral? yes, considered that but there are some problems in that for things like integral just showing mo with an integral sign in it doesn't actually tell people how to enter that. There's an argument that the spec shouldn't describe authoring techniques, so perhaps that's OK, but then it's hard to _see_ the difference between an mo with an invisible times and an mo with a function apply symbol, so in at least some cases a visbile version is needed. (I was experimenting with just changing the xslt stylesheet, so a soultion tat works uniformly for all entities has some attractions, although obviously I could special case the invisible (and white space) operators. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 10:36:27 UTC