- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:02:42 +0100
- To: max@berger.name
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> This is noted in the MathML 2 spec at 6.2.1. Also the DTD appendix says this explicitly, in its second paragraph: Note also that if no DTD is specified with a DOCTYPE declaration, that entity references (for example to refer to MathML characters by name) may not be used. > I would therefore like it to be more clear in the spec that the named > entities are only valid in standalone MathML document with a dtd. Yes. We've come to the conclusion (I think) that saying it (or saying it again in flashing red bold text:-) won't really help. One of the problems was that _all_ the examples used named entities and people not unreasonably are more likely to copy examples than to read the text... So we're currently experimenting with different formats for the examples. The current internal draft has <mo> ∫<!--INTEGRAL--> </mo> in examples where we previously had <mo> &int ;</mo> There's also work planned to address this issue in the test suite. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 09:02:51 UTC