- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:16:20 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: hammond@math.albany.edu, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <45BA5384.6050802@activemath.org>
It has been our experience that centered-math should rather be a paragraph style. This responds to the requirement of having formulae that are semantic (and thus wouldn't bear a spurious period) and to have several formulae in one line. When going to XHTML+MathML, this i pretty easy to map out... just center take care of putting the displaystyle in every math element. paul PS: I tend to be an non-friend of mtext... (and this saves the trip of depth one compound-documents!) David Carlisle wrote: >> Are there reasonably easy ways in LaTeX of handling a >> (document-level) end-of-sentence following a displaymath environment? >> > > depends what you mean by "after" > > \[ 1=2 \rlap{\quad .}\] > > does more or less the right thing, but is technically inside the math of > course, exactly the same issue as discussed foe <math>. > > similarly to the math suggestion you can do it outside as > > \par\(\displaystyle 1=2\).\par > > I think I have seen (and may even have written) a packahe that accepted > markup such as > > \[ 1=2 \]. > > that did the right thing (by essentially getting \] to lookahead see the > punctuation and turn itself into \par\(\displaystyle 1=2\).\par > but the problem with such things is that they are very fragile, > redefining core latex commands tends to break everyone else's packages. > > > David > > >
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 19:16:34 UTC