- From: Roger B. Sidje <rbs@maths.uq.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:44:20 +1000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: White Lynx <whitelynx@operamail.com>, www-math@w3.org
On 12/10/2006 2:25 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > Given how little the namespace-prefix syntax has taken off, and the number > of people who are confused by namespace syntax of any kind, and the large > amount of content on the Web that uses namespace-like syntax in a way that > would break renderings if it was interpreted according to namespace-like > parsing rules, however, I would strongly recommend against any sort of > namespace-based parsing extensions to HTML. As I mentioned before, I've > worked with an implementor in the past who tried to do this, and they > ended up wasting months of intense work trying to be compatible with the > large amounts of legacy content before eventually backing out the whole > thing and ignoring namespaces in text/html content. I can technically restrict the implementation to only support the plain <math>...</math>, while authors will effectively use <math xmlns="...">...</math> for IE+MathPlayer. (That is, Mozilla wouldn't actually require the xmlns attribute for the MathML rendering to kick in. Authors only put the attribute there for interoperability.) The issues now become: - can IE+MathPlayer be made to at least support <math xmlns="...">...</math>? (from David's recent post, it seems possible in IE7.x?) - what is the implication for HTML5? Just one of those random attributes that people put in their HTML document? (which wll be fine with me, BTW). - what about generators that emit prefixed tags? --- RBS
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 16:44:56 UTC