- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:13:00 +0100
- To: rbs@maths.uq.edu.au
- Cc: ian@hixie.ch, www-math@w3.org, dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org
> That example wasn't suggesting anything special about the literal "m" > indeed -- what it instead suggested was that the prefix string had to be > declared in the <html>. Right? Yes, the prefix is arbitrary. In IE (in html mode) it has to be there and the binding of the prefix to the rendering component is explicit in the page. I don't think anyone would want mozilla to have either of those restrictions. If though it _allowed_ a prefix on <m:math> in html mode it would enable pages to work in ie and mozilla at the same time, which is never a bad thing, really. David
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 00:13:12 UTC