- From: Paul Topping <pault@dessci.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:56:30 -0700
- To: "Roger B. Sidje" <rbs@maths.uq.edu.au>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: <www-math@w3.org>, <dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
IE handles multiple namespaces in HTML+XML. There is nothing special about the "m". To my knowledge, it doesn't handle nested XML islands, though. > -----Original Message----- > From: dev-tech-mathml-bounces@lists.mozilla.org > [mailto:dev-tech-mathml-bounces@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf > Of Roger B. Sidje > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:41 PM > To: Ian Hickson > Cc: www-math@w3.org; dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org; David Carlisle > Subject: Re: MathML-in-HTML5 > > On 4/10/2006 9:19 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > So basically, it's the same as tag soup. I don't really see > an advantage > > to going down that route (with its complexities like > namespace prefixes, > > etc) > > One could also think that prefixed tags are random tags in general. > > Is it because you are thinking globally w.r.t. multiple > mixings? Such as > <m:tag> <n:tag>...</n:tag> </m:tag>? > > (I am not sure what IE does if n: is attached to a plug-in.) > > If it just for the single MathML containment, the starting > patch that I > made emulates what IE+MathPlayer does: > > <html xmlns:m="mathml-namespace">, then > <m:math>...</m:math> in the document > > or > > <math xmlns="mathml-namespace">...</math> > with no need for a declaration in <html> > > (So it is a proof-of-concept of that emulation, and as the > patch showed, > not that invasive to emulate.) > --- > RBS > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-mathml mailing list > dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-mathml >
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 23:56:38 UTC