- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: whitelynx@operamail.com, dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org, www-math@w3.org
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, David Carlisle wrote: > > I agree, and this is one of the merits of the IE approach, that I hope > would be seriously considered for mozilla. It isn't necessary for HTML > <4+n> to specify "html-variants" of the various XML languages, _any_ > _well formed_ XML fragments can be included, so long as you register the > namespace with the application to bind it to a rendering component. What are the rules for handling non-well-formed content? (Could you show me an example of this? Different people seem to mean different things when they talk about IE's extension models.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 21:57:21 UTC