- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:05:52 +0100
- To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 22:06:02 UTC
Juan, This kind of blur between an identified-entity and a fixed symbol is common in mathematics I have studied; for example, when working with rings you can easily talk of a "2" (as 1+1) as a pretty general identifier and a bit later make it a symbol which you somewhat fix within some concrete representation of the natural numbers (or even with some generality!). why not be more constructive and give us a concrete math example that would approach your problem in a more direct fashion ? paul juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote: > What is difference: > A) > ci ---> abstract identifier > csymbol ---> concrete symbol defined either internally or externally (url) > > B) > ci ---> local identifier defined in the spec or in the doc via declare or > similar > csymbol ---> external symbol defined via external resource (url). > Both interpretations are different and i received both of them. >
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 22:06:02 UTC