- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:33:59 GMT
- To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> I do not know that validator is really doing, The term "validate" is defined in the XML recommendation. Unless it says otherwise, it (ought to be) safe to assume that a validating parser does what is defined there, in which case switching parsers shouldn't change the result if you don't change the DTD so it's not supprising that you found two online validators that gave the same result. > I am not interested in legacy issues. I simply pointed that certain MathML > validator validates as correct input is not correct according to the today > spec. It returns the result mandated by the XML specification. The document is a valid XML file, and any validating XML parser must report it as such. > I understand you, but only reason i said was that someone from _that_ CAS > can take a look to their validator for checking this. The validator is doing nothing wrong. As I said in the message to which you replied, we should perhaps look to change the DTD for mathml3, but that's for a future time, not now. David
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 13:34:16 UTC