- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
- To: White Lynx <whitelynx@operamail.com>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, whatwg@whatwg.org
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, White Lynx wrote: > > >> Browser vendors can handle XHTML now. It's a non-issue for them. > > Working for one I can assure you it's very much an issue. > > Once again, thank you very much for support. I look forward to assign > all Tag-Soup-MathML parsing, error handling bugs and browser > compatibility issues to you. The only think that I fear is that no one > who cries for new serialization here will take responsibility for > consequences and as usually someone else (= majorioty of users and > developers) will have to pay price for decisions made by those who don't > care much whether tomorrow we will have mathematical markup at all > (after all they don't use it and can happily live without it). Please keep your tone moderated and maintain a positive attitude when posting to the WHATWG mailing list. Being sarcastic or abrasive in the context of this community should not be tolerated. Focussing on the issue at hand, I would recommend those taking part in the part of this discussion that relates to Math markup to suggest constructive solutions for how to move forward in a text/html world, preferably with proof-of-concepts or experimental implementations. It is clear that not everyone will be pleased with whatever solution we end up using, since the requirements put forward by the various contributors so far are at best quite different and at worst contradictory. However, if we have actual implementations to play with, we can at least try to base our decisions on experience rather than guesses and opinions. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 6 November 2006 23:37:21 UTC