- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:56:45 +0100
- To: www-math@w3.org, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:48:59 +0100, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote: >>> Browser vendors can handle XHTML now. It's a non-issue for them. >> >> Working for one I can assure you it's very much an issue. > > Looking at http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/ it seems like you do a > pretty good job. :-) > > certainly there's new stuff in HTML 5 that will require new code to > support; but do you really think a few namespace prefixes will make it > harder to do that? I have no idea how namespace prefixes would work in an HTML parser. Perhaps you can take a look at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#parsing and see what might need to be done to make that namespace prefix compatible? I personally don't really see value in adding any kind of namespace syntax to HTML. Note that you can't rely on well-formedness in the parser and that you need to handle all error cases as well in a way that doesn't cause a "yellow screen of death" to be generated. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 14:56:55 UTC