- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 23:01:01 +0100
- To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 22:56:35 +0100, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote: >> I've no idea about XForms, but the plan for MathML is that you can >> write it without bothering about namespaces, but that it ends up having >> namespaces in the DOM. > > Then this is what I feared, and it's not sensible. Enabling mixed > HTML/MathML to be processed with generic tools and MathML specific tools > requires that it have the namespace, including all the necessary > namespace attributes. [...] Yes, exactly the reason they have the correct (MathML) namespace in the DOM. So they can be rendered, etc. The serialization format doesn't really matter. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2006 22:01:22 UTC