- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:09:20 +0100
- To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> Regarding DSSSL, well I am using (in some sense) it when use XSL. XSL is a > "subset" of DSSSL Not at all. they have different syntaxes, different processing models and different functionality. > and next version of DSSSL will be fully a superset of XSL. Have you ever looked at DSSSL? (it's one of the few ISO standards that you _can_ look at without paying money). > Assuming this true (I did not check), two may be prefered over > "infinite". you only get infinite ways in mathml by including arbitrary redundant mrow nesting and similar redundant features. If you going to do that for mathml you may as well count including arbitrary numbers of zero width spaces in a plain text Unicode encoding. It's about as relevant. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 12:14:00 UTC