- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:28:33 GMT
- To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> can be achieved via XPath axes. You know very well that this content-like > syntax can be "easily" parsed to presentation one. I'm sorry but I really don't see what you are trying to achieve here. If I need a parser capable of parsing <textnode>a+b</textnode> then I may as well have a full text based system that uses such a parser, asciimath or TeX or some simplified subset of tex (or maple or mathematica, or any one of dozens of similar alternatives). I honestly see no benefit in having some of the expression marked up as XML and some not. If you like that style, then fine. This list is even a suitable forum to discuss it as it is for discussion of any math on the web, not just mathml, but whenever you post to a public list you just get comments or not depending on whether any other readers choose to comment, and personally I haven't really got anything to say about such a format. David
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:35:52 UTC