- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:28:43 +0200
- To: "juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com" <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 14:28:52 UTC
<snip/> If there is emphasis on elimination of presentational "," "/", "i" and > even "+" from encoding of numbers (4.4.1.1.3 Examples). I see natural > also that presentational symbol for decimals was substituted. > > One could use some entity for the decimal mark but i find more > interesting markup. > > <cn type="rational"> 12342 <sep/> 2342342 </cn> > <cn type="complex-cartesian"> 12.3 <sep/> 5 </cn> > <cn type="complex-polar"> 2 <sep/> 3.1415 </cn> > > maybe just something like > > <cn type="real"> 12345 <sep/> 7 </cn> > > with default renderings > > 12342 / 2342342 > 12.3 + 5 i > Polar( 2 , 3.1415 ) > 12345.7 Well, I think you're going too far because why not in this case say <cn type="complex-cartesian"> 12<sep/>3 <sep/> 5 </cn> <cn type="complex-polar"> 2 <sep/> 3<sep/>1415 </cn> because we will have the same problem in this case which of the sep is the one we want ? Xmlizer
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 14:28:52 UTC