- From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
Patrick Ion said: > [Note to all: I decided to chop up my comments into sections > since otherwise this would be another very long message.] > > Dear Juan, > >>> >>> Yes, _today_ (but not then) _many_ (but not most, if you take market >>> share into account) browsers have _decent_ (but neither complete, nor >>> consistent) implementation of CSS. >> >> Then _none_ browser had support for MathML. Instead promoting MathML >> support, CSS would be improved and promoted _then_. >> > Actually, there is growing browser support for MathML. And cannot be compared with CSS support. > It does not follow from the present situation that only the > improvement of > CSS handling should be expected, or that only that should be called for. For instance, whereas MSIE continues ignoring native support for MathML (you need a third-party plugin), they have announced increasing support for CSS 2 in last version of the browser. > > Patrick Juan R. Center for CANONICAL| SCIENCE)
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 11:49:07 UTC