- From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
Patrick Ion said: > > Dear Canonical Scientist Juan, > > I assume that you intended to say > >> Prof. Hutchinson finished his talk by recognizing that Dear MathML and AMS author Patrick, thanks by this correction over [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2006Jul/0028.html] > and so on. However, I don't find the phrasing that seems > to be important to you in his publicly posted slides. I > do note [http://silas.psfc.mit.edu/mathmltalk/] Slide 8's text is let me introduce quotes from [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2006Jul/0025.html] > <<< > Conclusions > > MathML has a number of weaknesses. But it's close to being the best > we've got for browsable web publishing of mathematics. <blockquote> MathML has a number of weaknesses. </blockquote> > Producing MathML from the dominant mathematics authoring systems is > rather straightforward. > > Reading MathML is currently still not as effortless as it needs to be. > Browsers need improvements. Progress is being made. > > Will MathML "take off" and take over web mathematics publishing? > > My guess is that it won't. But with luck it will gradually become more > widespread. Hutchinson asked, will MathML ‘take off’ and take over web mathematics publishing? His reply was: <blockquote> My guess is that it won’t. But with luck it will gradually become more widespread. </blockquote> > There will remain a place for formats with perfect layout control (PS, > PDF etc.) MathML will have to establish its own niche. > <<< > > which does NOT seem to be your quoted > why not? Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 16:29:21 UTC