- From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:36:54 -0500
- To: www-math@w3.org
<juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com> writes:
> ... but cleaning any extra <mrow> containing a single child
> is not a hard problem.
Correct.
>>> Invisible times continues being represented by justaposition.
>>
>> This is a controversial matter; please do not pretend otherwise.
>
> What is controversial? The invisible times concept? The MathML entity? The
> Unicode character?
Mainly not allowing juxtaposition as default-operator-for-the-context in
presentation markup.
Secondarily, the fact that things like &invisibleTimes and
&applyFunction would be better handled (given the non-availability of
SDATA) as empty elements.
> I think that 'all' computer languages and content/semantic markup ...
But I was speaking about presentation markup.
-- Bill
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 20:37:02 UTC