- From: Jyrki Kajala <Jyrki.Kajala@savonia-amk.fi>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:29:13 +0300
- To: <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, <www-math@w3.org>
Hi Mikko, I have written a page based on the inputControl-applet by Design Science: http://dmath.savonia-amk.fi/scJK/public/toolbars/toolbarsEn.jsp That renders a*(-b) into <math> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>*</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </math> --Jyrki >>> Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net> 05/11/05 11:36 AM >>> I'm trying to generate MathML automatically from simple text syntax and I'm wondering which is the correct markup. Given source text like b * (-a) my current implementation generates <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>⁢</mo><!-- or ⋅ --> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>−</mo><!-- $$ --> <mi>a</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math> I'm wondering if the location marked with $$ is ok? Should another symbol be used for minus sign when its intent is to describe "negation of a" instead of "minus operator followed by a"? Or should the renderer use short minus sign automatically even though I use −? At least Mozilla renders long and ugly minus sign here. On the other hand b - a generates <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </math> which looks good at least in Mozilla. -- Mikko
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 11:29:27 UTC