- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:50:38 +0100
- To: Frank Yung-Fong Tang <franktang@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, www-math@w3.org
XQuery is, I suppose, fully implementable. I don't think a math-evaluator that would do all is fully implementable. And it was never the intent of MathML-content or OpenMath to produce something with an implementation for evaluation! There's much more that can be done with mathematical objects encoded in MathML-content! XQuery's evaluations are specified, I think, so there's no such thing as undecidability there, I believe. paul Le 9 mars 05, à 01:01, Frank Yung-Fong Tang a écrit : > If such danger exist, then why W3C ever release MathML? > If MathML content will easily become unparseable for XQuery > interpreter , then in what sense it could be parseable for other > application? > If MathML content will easily become inefficiently executable for > XQuery interpreter , then in what sense it could be efficiently > executable for other applications? > > I am not saying that the issue you concern about is not there. But if > they are valid concern for XQuery, then it probably will be valid > concern for any other single thing ...
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2005 09:51:12 UTC