- From: JB Collins <joebmath@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:29:49 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-math@w3.org
I am interested in representing equations in physics using content MathML. This is something I'm new to, so I'm exploring the ability of MathML to help me. One deficit in the math concepts I have found so far is that the Dirac Delta Function is not represented. Is this correct? I am aware of the recommendation regarding physical units. This does not, however, cover the full semantic information that representing an equation in physics requires. Here are some other requirements: (1) A key requirement is to represent, for example, that /rho represents the density of a certain physical object. (2) I might also want to give names to certain constructs, such as NewtonianSpaceTime for the specific instance of a metric-space (and time) of Newtonian physics, or the name of Newtons2ndLaw to a statement about F=ma. (3) Vectors are often elements of NewtonianSpaceTime. Can I declare them to be of that type? I would also like to declare PhysicalObject as a class. Can I do this? Any insights are welcome. Regards, Joe C. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 02:55:58 UTC