- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 16:30:01 +0200
- To: www-math@w3.org
On 14-May-04, at 07:04 Uhr, Bruce Miller wrote: > (b2) to do just enough that mathematics can be presented, but that > some/most MathML would have to be simplified before CSS stylesheets > could describe it's presentation? This approach is seducing, it lets presentation-process-developers hope for the ability to as much dynamic-HTML with formulae than what can be done (sort of) in current browsers. And at the same time, accepting this would at least mean we abandon the content-side of MathML. Where would we find, then, such great things as synchronized content and presentation subtrees ? (this should all be XHTML, SVG, or other CSS-supporting-platfom). Moreover, the "mathematical" nature of the math subtrees would be lost. This would mean that copy and paste would be even more random and may be an issue for accessibility... unless content (semantic) data would be made available. What can hosts of CSS (SVG, XHTML) offer for such embedding of semantic content ? paul
Received on Friday, 14 May 2004 10:31:03 UTC