- From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:13:38 +1100 (EST)
- To: www-math@w3.org
Hi, I have a question regarding the application of relative font sizes to inherited fontsize attributes on mstyle in the miSfontsize9 test case: <mstyle fontsize='0.1in'> <mi>A</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi fontsize='2em'>A</mi> ... </mstyle> The first A identifier and both + operators inherit the fontsize of 0.1in from the parent mstyle. But what about the second A, which has a relative font size? One would assume that this relative font size of 2em is applied to the fontsize inherited from the mstyle, producing a result of 0.2in. However, in the expected output for this test case the A is much bigger, and it seems to be applying the 2em to the default font size from *before* the mstyle, ignoring the fontsize that was set on the mstyle altogether. Is the expected output for miSfontsize9 incorrect? Or have I misread the specification? The definition of mstyle does not seem to clearly specify how relative values are applied to inherited attributes. Best regards, Michael -- YesLogic Prince prints XML! http://yeslogic.com
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 04:16:08 UTC