Re: <mi> 1 </mi>

> In this case (planck) they may well have agreed, but in others such as 
> double struck C
> they probably had (a bit) more reason to refuse to classify this as "the
> complex numbers" and allow 1D39A as a generic double strck C.

Right, I see their point if it applies to other examples as well.

It is a bit strange though, to see the unassigned code point just sitting
there between G and I, and will require implementations to have special
case code or a mapping table rather than just mapping the whole range in
one go. Such is life :)

Thanks again,


YesLogic Prince prints XML!

Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 05:15:07 UTC