Re: <mi> 1 </mi>

Hi David,

> That one is called PLANCK CONSTANT not italic small h, but it is
> offically the same thing, and the reason for the gap.

Thanks, I never would have found that one!

I find that an interesting justification for the lack of an assignment for
"MATHEMATICAL ITALIC SMALL H", as wouldn't this character actually have
different semantics to "PLANCK CONSTANT"?

Or have the semantics been changed in a recent UNICODE version without 
changing the official name?

Best regards,


YesLogic Prince prints XML!

Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 02:01:41 UTC