- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:57:48 +0100
- To: ian@hixie.ch
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
...so I think if the test cases are to be useful with, e.g., Mozilla or any other Web browser that might be implementing MathML, the namespace declarations should be given. Yes I agree really, I was just explaining how they validated here in the absence of those declarations. Those are presumably not conformant implementations, though, so why would the test suite have workarounds for them? I would not agree with adding anything to the test suite that made the files non conformant but we wanted to use the test suite to test the current implementations and without that PI that isn't possible. The files still I think conform to all applicable standards with that PI there. It's presence doesn't imply the browser need to support XSLT, eg Amaya ignores (as it may) the xslt stylesheet reference and renders the presentation mathml tests natively. Unfortunately they don't have the reference image, which is required to know if the UA is implementing the result correctly or not. True, but the xhtml+mathml files that do have the image also have explict namespace declarations. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2004 09:04:46 UTC