- From: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:51:33 -0600
- To: paul@activemath.org
- CC: RobertM@dessci.com, pj75@gmx.de, www-math@w3.org
Hi. > Although it looks interesting for an amount of task... do I understand that > you're opening the door to yet another system with possibly, say, yet another > interpretation of the arccos ? Yes. But as this is true for any new piece of software that has an interpretation for functions like arccos, I'm not sure what the implication is? That no new mathematical software should be written? --Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr. Robert Miner RobertM@dessci.com MathML 2.0 Specification Co-editor 651-223-2883 Design Science, Inc. "How Science Communicates" www.dessci.com ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 10:52:54 UTC