- From: Pepping, Simon (ELS) <S.Pepping@elsevier.nl>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:37:10 +0100
- To: "'Robert Miner'" <RobertM@dessci.com>, jpederse@wiley.com
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
We at Elsevier would indeed like to create a set of conventions, so that we do not get every possible variation in our files. The end of the operator dictionary gives a good start: ˘, ¸, `, ˙, ˝, ←, ↔, ⥎, ↼, ´, →, ⇀, ˜, ¨, ̑, ˇ, ^, ‾, ⏞, ⎴, ⏜, ⃛, _, ⏟, ⎵, ⏝ I have added to them ˚ as a possible accent. It would indeed be useful to see the list that is used in MathPlayer. Regards, Simon Simon Pepping DTD Development and Maintenance Elsevier s.pepping@elsevier.com www.elsevier.com/locate/sgml Robert Miner [mailto:RobertM@dessci.com] wrote on 31 July 2003 17:59: > MathML itself doesn't say which, if any, of the various possible > accent characters is preferrable, e.g. overdot vs. combining overdot > vs. center dot when what you mean is "derivative". For one thing, its > probably a hopeless job to try to identify a single cannonical > character for every possible mathematical meaning, when in point of > fact, none of the text-oriented Unicode characters available is a very > good fit. Now if a major publisher like Elsevier or Wiley wanted to > come up with a set of conventions, and disseminate them, that would be > a big step forward. But as of today, there really isn't any such set > of conventions. So, for better or worse, I guess the real answer to > your questions is "use the character that works best in most > applications." > > Therefore, MathPlayer (and I assume Netscape/Mozilla) puts a lot of > effort into analyzing accent constructs and trying to do the right > thing. > > If you think it would help you, I can look into distributing a > (probably partial) list of "accent characters" that MathPlayer gives > special treatment. I'm a little hestitant to commit MathPlayer to a > specific list, since I don't have tons of faith we have made the right > decisions in every case. However, if you guys are thinking about > establishing markup conventions within your companies, it would give > you some hard information to start with. > > Let me know if you would find this useful. > > --Robert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dr. Robert Miner RobertM@dessci.com > MathML 2.0 Specification Co-editor 651-223-2883 > Design Science, Inc. "How Science Communicates" www.dessci.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 06:45:44 UTC