- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:29:45 +0100
- To: Bill.Naylor@mcs.vuw.ac.nz
- CC: www-math@w3.org
Bill, Thank you for your comment. http://www.openmath.org/cd/setname1.ocd this is ambiguous as it stands, since that CD holds definitions of six symbols. The example would be more accurately (unambiguously) stated as: I think that the existing examples are technically correct (The semantics of definitionURL are sufficiently flexible to allow a single URI to cover different symbol definitions) however it would be clearer if they were separated. You suggested definitionURL="http://www.openmath.org/cd/setname1.ocd#N" Which is the form used already in some of the OM -> MathML conversion scripts, however openmath.org serves .ocd files as text/plain so that you get a "source view", and the browser doesn't scroll to the definition of N if you follow that link. We propose to use definitionURL="http://www.openmath.org/cd/setname1#N" without any explict extension as an abstract identifier for this symbol. The server at openmath.org (now!) will redirect that to the html form http://www.openmath.org/cd/setname1.html#N where the fragment identifier #N will work as expected and scroll the view to the symbol N. I hope this is acceptable. As this is a "last call" comment, please acknowledge on the list if it is (or isn't) as we need to record the resolution of all comments as part of the process of moving the document on to the next stage. Thanks again for your careful review, David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 06:30:13 UTC