- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:58:26 +0100
- To: ping@zesty.ca
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> You have forgotten that MINSE expressions are medium-independent > (it's right there in the first two letters of the acronym "MINSE"). > Although images are one target, they are not the only possible target. but the point is that if the server desides to send you an image then that is what you get on the client and so the structure is hidden. and so minse in this respect is no different from any other server side generation of the mathematics images from other sources (such as tex fragments) > And that's rather sad. It's just depressing to see people like Eugene > suffering with complicated workarounds (and needing "miracles" bestowed > by wizards like David) when there's a much easier way. I'm not sure it's easier, also the end result is undoubtably worse. that isn't a fault of your minse system as such it is just a feature of using images in a browser: alignment with the rest of the text will be worse, printing is usually pretty bad (depends on the resolution of the images) etc etc. The formatting of the native mathml renders in browsers is getting really quite good and the important thing is that it is integrated into the document in a natural way, just simple things like selecting a larger text size from the menu just works, the mathematics gets bigger as well as the text. That doesn't happen if you are served a set of images. If you look down the list of problems and issues with cross browser support in this thread you'll see many of them are unrelated to mathml. Really they are just general xml (and xhtml) issues. In order to get XMl (served as xml mime type) to render in IE you need to supply some kind of stylesheet, this is true even if you are just using xhtml and haven't any mathematics at all. So any "complicated workarounds" are to the user, no different to teh workarounds needed for xhtml. The stylesheet needs a few extra things to handle mathml, but that isn't the users problem. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 12:58:39 UTC