- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:35:04 GMT
- To: Martin.Dransfield@eslo.co.uk
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> Is this an error Yes something is in error in that the paragraph refers to blank lines that are not there. > (I can't see it in the errata)? No. I believe you are the first to report this, sorry, and thanks. If you look at the mathml 1 version http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/appendixC.html you'll see the basic effect that was intended. The grouping is not present in the source XML file from which the appendix is generated, so this isn't a stylesheet issue. The grouping is also referred to in chapter 3 (as it was in mathml 1) so I believe that the correct course of action will be to update the dictionary in appendix F with the groups restored, but this is a personal response, Some other member of the Working Group (or the CVS log:-) may have a better recollection of what was intended here, so please don't take this as an official response (but one will be forthcoming) Thanks for the report, David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 11:35:26 UTC