Re: undeclared entities? from David Carlisle on 2002-06-02 (www-math@w3.org from June 2002)

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 14:40:59 +0100
To: housel@acm.org
CC: www-math@w3.org
Message-Id: <200206021340.OAA19541@penguin.nag.co.uk>

> in isonum.ent are both wrong; they should read

> <!ENTITY lt               "&#x26;#x0003C;" ><!--=less-than sign R: -->
> <!ENTITY amp              "&#x26;#x00026;" ><!--=ampersand -->

Ooops, thanks how did that slip through...
Actually in the new DTD I've changed it already to produce exactly
the text in the xml specification, as some parsers warn if the definition
is different (even if it's correct).

David



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 09:42:00 UTC