- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:51:47 -0400
- To: aldiaz@us.ibm.com, mf@w3.org
- CC: www-math@w3.org, ij@w3.org, jongund@uiuc.edu
Hello, I am an editor of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) 1.0 [1], which has recently entered Candidate Recommendation status. I am also Team contact for the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG). While MathML and UAAG are different types of documents, I think that UAAG would benefit greatly from one or more test suites resembling the one created for MathML. UAAG 1.0 provides accessibility guidelines that are independent of any particular format (HTML, SVG, even MathML). It is clear to our WG that developers will have a much easier time working with the document if we provide them with supplemental, format-specific materials. During Candidate Recommendation, I hope to coordinate the development of such materials for a number of formats (e.g., HTML, SVG, SMIL, and why not MathML!). I am wondering what process the MathML WG adopted to create the test suite. For instance, was there a particular process followed to submit/approve tests? What tools were used to create the test files or to generate the test suite? Thank you for any advice or pointers you can offer. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10 -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2001 12:52:18 UTC