- From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:02:58 -0500
- To: "William Arthur Naylor" <bill@scl.csd.uwo.ca>, <www-math@w3.org>
It seems as if you are mixing presentation and content markup at the wrong level.
I think you really mean what I show below, perhaps with the additional observation
that the "presentation" of
<apply>
<select/>
<ci>x</ci>
<ci>i</ci>
</apply>
is given by
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
which be communicated with a "syntax" construct such as
<semantics>
<apply>
<select/>
<ci>x</ci>
<ci>i</ci>
</apply>
<annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Presentation">
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</annotation-xml>
</semantics>
Stan D.
<math>
<apply>
<set/>
<bvar>
<c>i</c>
</bvar>
<condition>
<apply>
<and/>
<apply>
<geq/>
<ci>i</ci>
<cn>0</cn>
</apply>
<apply>
<leq/>
<ci>i</ci>
<cn>n</cn>
</apply>
<apply>
<in/>
<ci>i</ci>
<integers/>
</apply>
</apply>
</condition>
<apply>
<select/>
<ci>x</ci>
<ci>i</ci>
</apply>
<ci/>
</apply>
</math>
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Arthur Naylor" <bill@scl.csd.uwo.ca>
To: <www-math@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:27 PM
Subject: Generic symbol problems
> I would like to produce content MathML equivalent to the following
> LaTeX:
>
> $/{x_1,\ldots ,x_n/}$
>
> I have the following attempt:
>
> <math>
> <set>
> <bvar>
> <ci><msub>
> <mi>x</mi>
> <mi>i</mi>
> </msub></ci>
> </bvar>
> <condition>
> <apply>
> <and/>
> <apply>
> <leq/><cn>1</cn><ci>i</ci>
> </apply>
> <apply>
> <leq/><ci>i</ci><ci>n</ci>
> </apply>
> <apply>
> <in/><ci> i </ci><integers/>
> </apply>
> </apply>
> </condition>
> </set>
> </math>
>
> however I am not happy with the implied assumption that <ci>i</ci> is
> the same as <mi>i</mi>. I would be glad to here if anyone has any
> ideas or solutions with regard to this problem,
>
> regards,
>
> Bill Naylor.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 14:03:12 UTC