(Late) comments on PR MathML 2.0 (content)


	Here are three comments of a naive reader on the content part 
of the proposed recommendation:

- maximum and minimum

	if the three default renderings given at the end of this 
section are meant to render the three successive examples, it would 
be nice to have a hint of how to differenciate the two last ones.

- union and intersection

	it appears that these operators cannot have qualifiers 
(lowlimit, uplimit, bvar, contition, interval comes to mind). I 
understand that it is possible to modify the default definition but I 
find it odd.

- declare and 2.2: math and eventualy 7: The MathML interface

	in, it is said that the scope of the declaration is 
the entire math element within which the declaration is made. Now 
imagine that I am writing a mathematical textbook in XHTML and I want 
to use MathML. The way to do it, I understand consists of including 
math tags surrounding each mathematical piece of code in the XHTML 
document. I would like, in this context, that the scope of my 
declared elements span the whole XHTML document. I think that this is 
a natural requirement.
How can this be achieved?

  *** all mail received between Thu 25.01 and 26.01 has been lost
	please send again ***

  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr

Received on Thursday, 8 February 2001 04:11:15 UTC