- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 21:42:02 -0400
- To: Bruce Virga <BruceV@mathtype.com>, "'www-math@w3.org'" <www-math@w3.org>
At 11:52 AM -0700 10/16/00, Bruce Virga wrote: > "Since 75% of the >world's scientific and technical documents are Microsoft Word documents with >Equation Editor and MathType equations, it's very important that our users >have a way to present those documents on the Web. Now how do you know that? It sounds to me like a figure plucked out of thin air. Certainly it's decidedly untrue for all the scientific and technical documents I deal with. I guess it depends on your definition of "technical" but I'd say that by far the most common format I run across in science is the TeX document or PostScript or PDF documents generated from a TeX document. HTML is a distant second. Word doesn't even merit a mention. The only way to move Word up in the rankings would be to include the vast quantities of computer documentation that don't use equations like software manuals and computer books. A lot of this is written in Word, but since almost none of it uses equations, that hardly matters here. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Monday, 16 October 2000 21:44:47 UTC