Re: Comments on MathML Last Call Draft (cont'd)

Hi Kamthan,

Dear Pankaj,

As usual, thanks for your careful reading of the spec, and for hunting
up all the references!  I'm in charge of corrections in chapter 7, so
here is a list of itemized corrections for chapter 7:

> 7.1.3
> Reference(s) to:
> 
> "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of 
> Internet Message Bodies", N. Freed and N. Borenstein, November 1996. 
> Note that this RFC obsoletes RFC1521, RFC1522, and RFC1590. 
> Available at ftp://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt. 
> 
> "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", 
> N. Freed and N. Borenstein, November 1996. Note that this RFC obsoletes 
> RFC1521, RFC1522, and RFC1590. 
> Available at ftp://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt. 
> 
> may be useful here.

Done.  I also updated the MathML MIME type to match with the one given
in Murata's draft on XML Media types.

> 7.1.4
> "However, there are two notable exceptions."
> It may be useful to mention exactly which at this stage (the XHTML anchor 
> "a" and image "img" elements).

I agree. I added a sentence spelling this out.

> 7.1.4.1
> "The reader is cautioned that this is at present still a working draft, 
> and is therefore subject to future revision." 
> Yes, but XLink is ahead of MathML 2.0 schedule. Last call ended on March 
> 20, 2000.

Good point.  This will probably have to be a last minute edit,
whenever a data for the XLink spec comes through.

--Robert

Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2000 22:27:51 UTC