- From: Thomas Cool <cool@dataweb.nl>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 10:07:56 +0200
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Dear Tim Berners-Lee, Earlier I have sent you my comments on MathML (with a copy to the working group). My apologies if you feel burdened by these emails. But I cannot escape the impression that this matter is something for your desk, since the group is too pre-occupied with its apparent success. Taking stock: My suggestion is that you help that something like the following statement is included in the MathML 2.0 document, summary and press release: "MathML 2.0 is not to be seen as a standard for the use of mathematics on the computer and internet but rather as a discussion paper in the context of the development of such a standard. Currently there are various systems for doing mathematics with the computer, and this creates quite some confusion. This confusion is increased by the issues of copyright and ownership of language since many such programs have a commercial basis. The advise should be that scientists co-operate into solving this confusion, and that they establish a clear standard for the use of mathematics on the computer and the internet. Also governments, educators and businesses would benefit from such a standard. Such a standard would be based on these principles: (1) that the language of mathematics cannot be copyright or owned, and (2) that there has been developing a practical and elegant standard in and by the way that people have been using mathematics over the centuries. In line with these principles, it must be understood that MathML 2.0 differs from existing commercial formats only for the reason that it is more useful in the short run to avoid the risk of litigation and hold-up. This decision in no way implies acceptance of existing commercial claims about copyright or ownership in the realm of the language of mathematics and its representation on the computer and the internet." This is the most important suggestion that I can do. My paper 'disappointment and embarrassment' contains more suggestions in detail, but this requires the attention of a more interested reader. Sincerely yours, Thomas Cool http://www.dataweb.nl/~cool http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/get/papers/0004/0004002.html http://econwpa.wustl.edu/eprints/get/papers/0004/0004002.abs also available at http://www.dataweb.nl/~cool/Papers/MathML/OnMathML.html
Received on Monday, 1 May 2000 04:10:27 UTC