- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 16:23:35 +0100 (BST)
- To: hammond@csc.albany.edu
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> Has ISO been approached? Not by me. > (Perhaps the xml definition could use a "precedence level" in connection > with entity set inclusions.) Are you suggesting a change to XML? Incidentally, according to the XML spec (4.2 first paragraph) an XML application may warn of multiple entity definitions as a __user option__ So if Xeena is a conforming XML application it should have a user customisation option to turn these warnings off. > Since these two files have origin in other different places (ISO and > AMS, is this right, wrong or is the duplication at ISO?) yes the `A' in `AMS' is not American but Additional. > Without having checked I did check at the time and I believe that mathml and HTML were in agreement on all entity definitions. I hope that's still true:-) David
Received on Thursday, 28 October 1999 11:28:11 UTC