- From: Robert Miner <rminer@geomtech.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 19:42:47 -0500
- To: devlinh@nwu.edu
- CC: www-math@w3.org
Hi Hugh,
> Thanks for your reply and for your work on MathML.
> Sorry if my question was not clear.
> I found the Unicode character and the MathML alias I was looking for,
> but I guess I was asking more about MathML,
> where's the content mark-up element for "equivalence", "biconditional"?
Ah, now I understand. It was I who was missing something...
Your suggestion is a very good one. I agree. I should double check
before making a promise, but I am pretty confident that "equivalence"
is slated for addition as a content logic operator in the next
revision of the spec.
The working group has set itself the task of getting out
a draft by the time we next meeting in early November. This next
revision (version 2.0) will be the last one for a while, since the
W3C Math group's charter runs out in February.
--Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Miner http://www.webeq.com
Geometry Technologies, Inc. email: rminer@geomtech.com
phone: 651-223-2884
----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 9 October 1999 20:42:57 UTC