- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:52:56 GMT
- To: ceramist@worldnet.att.net
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> Sorry if the HTML format was confusing, I forgot to set the mailer to = > plain text. Your resend was also one of those nasty send-it-twice-as-HTML thingies, but no matter, we'll survive:-) > Relation tags do not work since they are supposed = > to be rendered as true of false No, relations are supposed to be rendered as equations, just as <apply> renders a function application literally rather than trying to apply the function. (In fact it is arguable that there is no difference at all in meaning between <apply> and <reln>) > I have seen another tag that was not mentioned in the MathML > documentation. (See http://irt.org/articles/js081/index.htm ) It is > called <e> WebEq uses (or did use?) this tag. It is essentially just the early name for <reln> so it should not be used with any software that has been updated to use the final W3C recommendation version of MathML1.0 rather than one of the draft submissions. > If right, this would be a simple solution for my mathematical content = > evaluator. I'd do that, but using <reln> rather than <apply>. David
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 1999 04:54:26 UTC