- From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@maplesoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:56:57 -0500
- To: "'roconnor@uwaterloo.ca'" <roconnor@uwaterloo.ca>, www-math@w3.org
One design objective was to keep the introduction of new elements to a minimum. Initially, one "repetition counter" type of element was used in all such settings - partial derivatives, log bases, roots. The notion "degree of a log" seemed to stretch the common use of "degree" too far, so "logbase" was introduced. The distinction between degree and degree occuring inside a root element seemed unnecessary. Stan Devitt Waterloo Maple Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor > [SMTP:roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca] > Sent: Friday, March 13, 1998 10:29 PM > To: www-math@w3.org > Subject: log vs root > > Why does log have a logbase element, but root doesn't have a rootdgree > element? This seems like an inconsistancy. > > -- > Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca > <URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/> > "And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message" > -- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
Received on Monday, 16 March 1998 09:00:05 UTC