- From: James Calloway <jcallowa@nando.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 14:53:25 -0500
- To: www-logging@w3.org
- Cc: jcallowa@nando.net
> > * To: www-logging@w3.org > * Subject: Session-ID > * From: Rohit Khare <khare@pest.w3.org> > * Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 14:29:26 -0500 > * From khare@pest.w3.org Fri Feb 16 14: 28:07 1996 > * Reply-To: khare@w3.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > There are several session-ID proposals floating around. Cookies, I think, are > a dubious way to handle user identification for the future. > > One stab at it is: > > >1) Session Identification > > > >Obviously, people today *are* able to do sessions with URL-munging, > >cookies, BASIC auth, etc. It's clear, though,that JEPI will strongly > >suggest a session-identifier to track the state of negotiation. > > > >Rohit presented the alternatives that have been developed, > >such as "MD5(secret|hostname), counter++". We can create pseudonyms, > >session counters, and so on. Originally, this was included in 3 > >(demographic profiling). > > > >I think that we need some input from HTTP,the logging & measurement > >groups, and implementors. If we can solve the problem of > >discriminating 'user sessions' (such as multiple windows on a site), > >we should run with one of these solutions. > > > >Protocol Name: http://pep.w3.org/Session > >Parameters: {id MD5(client_secret | scheme://host:port)} > > {c integer++} > > What's missing is a UI to 'scramble' the ID and come in without being > correlated to past or future visits. > > Thoughts? > > Rohit Khare Identification of a session probably should be kept separate from the identification of a user. The former should be automatic, the latter voluntary. In other words, don't even attempt to use a meaningful ID to track the session. Simple approach would be for the browser to generate a "dynamic cookie," an otherwise meaningless number that is preserved only for the duration of the session (from start to quit of the browser). The number should be sufficiently large and random so that the chances of getting a duplicate are insignificant. -- James Calloway, General Manager http://www.nando.net Nando.net, a McClatchy New Media company 127 W. Hargett St., Suite 406, Raleigh, NC 27601-1351 Voice: (919) 836-2858 FAX: (919) 836-2814
Received on Thursday, 29 February 1996 14:52:09 UTC